Anatomic Referencing of the Distal Femur in Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Impact of Orientation on Femoral Component Size.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic referencing in total knee arthroplasty places the femoral component flush to the anterior cortex while maintaining posterior condylar offset (PCO). The intent of this study was to evaluate how component position influences the femoral component size. METHODS: Digital surface models were created using 446 femora from an established computed tomography database. Virtual bone resections, component sizing, and component placement were performed assuming neutral (0°) flexion and neutral (3°) rotation relative to the posterior condyles. The appropriately sized femoral component, which had 2 mm of incremental size, was placed flush with the anterior cortex for optimal restoration of the PCO. Sizing and placement were repeated using 3 and 6° flexion and 0, 5, and 7° external rotation (ER). RESULTS: At 0° flexion, decreasing ER from 3 to 0° resulted in an average decreased anterior-posterior height (APH) of 1.9 mm, corresponding to a component size decrease of 1 for 88% of patients. At 7° ER, component size increased by an average of 2.5 mm, corresponding to a size increase for 80% of patients. Flexing the femoral component to 3° with ER at 3° resulted in a decrease in APH of 2.2 mm (1 size decrease in 93% of patients). At 3° flexion and 3° ER, 86% had the same component size as at 0° flexion and 0° ER. Increasing ER at 3° flexion increased APH by 1.2 mm at 5° and 3.1 mm at 7° on average, relative to 3° ER. Increasing flexion from 3 to 6° extended this effect. CONCLUSIONS: Flexion decreases the APH when the ER is held constant. The ER of the femoral component increases the APH across all tested flexion angles, causing an increase in the ideal femoral component size to maintain PCO. With anatomic referencing, alterations in femoral component positioning and subsequent changes in component size can be accounted for.

Patient Perception of Preoperative Nutrition and Recovery After Orthopaedic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence supports the use of nutritional supplementation to improve patient outcomes. The intent of this study was to utilize an anonymous questionnaire to determine patients' baseline knowledge, attitude, and belief regarding nutrition before total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: After receiving Institutional Review Board approval, an anonymous questionnaire was administered to 300 patients, comprising 184 women (61.3%) and 116 men (38.6%), averaging 67 years (range, 39 to 89). There were 238 TKAs (79.3%), 12 revision TKAs (4%), 44 THAs (14.6%), and 6 revision THAs (2%). RESULTS: Almost all (99.6%) subjects recognized the importance of preoperative nutrition. Most (83.0%) claimed that they knew what to eat preoperatively to optimize their surgical outcomes and expressed high levels of self-reported confidence (98.6%). Women were more likely to report having knowledge of preoperative nutrition (P = .05), and advanced education levels were linked to higher confidence (P = .002). Only 169 (56.3%) subjects reported knowing what supplements to take. When asked, 84% of subjects stated that they would purchase a nutrition program if recommended by their surgeon. Most studies show that an improved diet and appropriate supplementation can optimize nutritional status and potentially improve surgical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm that most patients do not know how to achieve optimal nutrition. Therefore, we believe there is a need for patient education on preoperative nutrition and its benefits.

Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to colonoscopy with biopsy does not decrease risk of prosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty recipients.

Introduction: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) risk continues to receive much attention given its associated morbidity and costs to patients and healthcare systems. It has been hypothesized that invasive colonoscopies may increase the risk of PJI. However, the decision to administer antibiotic prophylaxis lacks clinical guidance. In this study we aimed to compare PJI rates in patients undergoing colonoscopies with and without antibiotic prophylaxis against a control group, analyzing PJI occurrences at 90 days, 6 months, 9 months, and 1-year post-procedure and (2) assess the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on PJI rates to inform clinical guidelines. Methods: We queried a national, all-payer database to identify all primary total knee arthroplasty procedures without prior history of PJI between January 2010 and October 2020 (n = 1.9 million). All patients who had a diagnosis of PJI within one year of index procedure were excluded. There were three cohorts identified: colonoscopy with biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis; colonoscopy with biopsy with antibiotic prophylaxis; and a control of no prior colonoscopy. Both colonoscopy cohorts were slightly younger and had higher comorbidities than the controls. The PJI diagnoses were identified at four separate time intervals within one-year after colonoscopy: 90-days; 6-months; 9-months; and 1-year. Chi-square analyses with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were conducted for PJI rates between groups at all time-points. Results: Among all cohorts, no significant differences in PJI rates were found at 90-days (P = 0.459), 6-months (P = 0.608), 9-months (P = 0.598), and 1-year (P = 0.330). Similarly, direct comparison of both colonoscopy groups, with and without antibiotic prophylaxis, demonstrated no PJI rate differences at 90-day (P = 0.540), 6-months (P = 0.812), 9-months (P = 0.958), and 1-year (P = 0.207). Ranges of ORs between the colonoscopy cohorts were 1.07-1.43. Conclusion: Invasive colonoscopy does not increase the risk of PJI in patients who have pre-existing knee implants. Furthermore, antibiotic prophylaxis may not be warranted in patients undergoing colonoscopy who have a planned biopsy.

Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is an indicated treatment of several medical conditions including late-onset hypogonadism, congenital syndromes, and gender affirmation hormonal therapy. Increasing population age, medical benefits, and public awareness of TRT have resulted in increased prevalence of its utilization. However, TRT is not without concern for adverse risks including venous thromboembolic complications, cardiovascular events, and prostate issues. In the field of orthopaedic surgery, research is beginning to delineate the complex relationship between TRT and the development of orthopaedic conditions and potential effects on surgical interventions and outcomes. In this review, we discuss current literature surrounding TRT and subsequent development of osteoarthritis, incidence of total joint arthroplasty, musculotendinous pathology, postoperative infection risk, improvements in postoperative rehabilitation metrics, enhancement of osseous healing, and increased bone-implant integration. The authors suggest future areas of investigation that may provide guidance on how surgeons can mitigate adverse risks while optimizing benefits of TRT in the orthopaedic patient.

An Evaluation of Anatomic Referencing for Femoral Component Sizing Using Computed Tomography-Based Computer Modeling.

One of the critical steps in total knee arthroplasty is femoral component positioning and sizing. Historically, there was wider variability between femoral component sizes, necessitating the concepts of anterior referencing (AR) and posterior referencing (PR). With the introduction of smaller increments between sizes, the concept of anatomic referencing has been introduced to replace AR and PR. The intent of this study was to validate the concept of anatomic referencing and show that with 2 mm increments in femoral sizes, the femoral component can be placed flush to the anterior cortex while maintaining posterior condylar offset (PCO). Digital surface models were created using 515 femurs from an established computed tomography database. Virtual bone resections, component sizing and placement were performed assuming neutral mechanical axis and a cartilage thickness of 2 mm. The appropriately sized femoral component, which had 2 mm incremental sizes, was placed flush with the anterior cortex with restoration of the PCO. The anterior-posterior distance from the posterior surface of the component to the medial and lateral surfaces of the posterior condylar cartilage were measured. The medial condyle was the limiting condyle in the majority of cases (73%). The average medial gap after appropriate femoral component matching was 0.6 mm (0.39-1.41 mm) across all sizes. The overall average condylar gap was 1.02 mm. The most common femoral component was a size 7 (57.2 mm) and the average femoral AP width was 55.9 mm. Anatomic referencing with an implant system that has 2-mm increments in femoral component sizing provides an alternative to AR and PR without compromise. Anatomic referencing allows for perfect alignment of the anterior flange of the femoral component to the anterior cortex of the femur while restoring the native PCO to within 1 mm. This avoids having to choose between AR or PR when in between femoral sizes.

Anatomic Referencing Restores the Anatomy of the Distal Femur with Less Compromise.

Historically, anterior referencing and posterior referencing are two specific techniques that surgeons can use for proper sizing of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this review, we introduce the concept of "anatomic referencing" which has become useful with more incremental sizes of the femoral component to more perfectly match the native anatomy of each patient and reduce overstuffing of the patellofemoral joint and medial-lateral (ML) overhang. Fifty consecutive TKA cases were reviewed where the novel anatomic referencing technique was used. Lateral radiographic projections were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively. The posterior condylar offset (PCO) was evaluated on the lateral radiographs by measuring the distance between the tangent line of the femoral diaphysis posterior cortex and the posterior condylar margin. PCO ratio (PCOR) was calculated by dividing the PCO by the distance between the posterior condylar border and a tangent line along the anterior cortex of the femoral diaphysis. Forty-five patients (50 TKAs) were reviewed. Average age of the patients was 70.34, range: 47-91. There were 19 males and 26 females reviewed in this series. On average, the delta PCOR was 0.022 (standard deviation = 0.032; min: -0.049, max: 0.082). When grouping our results into three main groups: < -0.03, -0.03 to 0.03, and > 0.03, we found that 62% fell within the -0.03 to 0.03 range. There was no statistically significant difference in delta PCOR between standard and narrow implants (p = 0.418). The proposed novel anatomic referencing technique has allowed for proper sizing of patients' femurs in the anteroposterior and ML direction while avoiding component overhang or the need for component downsizing to obtain a proper ML fit. This radiographic review confirmed this to be a highly accurate and reproducible technique.